Skip to content

Conversation

@dependabot
Copy link
Contributor

@dependabot dependabot bot commented on behalf of github Jul 28, 2025

Bumps coverage[toml] from 7.10.0 to 7.10.1.

Release notes

Sourced from coverage[toml]'s releases.

7.10.1

Version 7.10.1 — 2025-07-27

  • Fix: the exclusion for if TYPE_CHECKING: was wrong: it marked the branch as partial, but it should have been a line exclusion so the entire clause would be excluded. Improves issue 831.
  • Fix: changed where .pth files are written for patch = subprocess, closing issue 2006.

➡️  PyPI page: coverage 7.10.1. :arrow_right:  To install: python3 -m pip install coverage==7.10.1

Changelog

Sourced from coverage[toml]'s changelog.

Version 7.10.1 — 2025-07-27

  • Fix: the exclusion for if TYPE_CHECKING: was wrong: it marked the branch as partial, but it should have been a line exclusion so the entire clause would be excluded. Improves issue 831_.

  • Fix: changed where .pth files are written for patch = subprocess, closing issue 2006_.

.. _issue 2006: nedbat/coveragepy#2006

.. _changes_7-10-0:

Commits
  • 7fdcbeb docs: sample HTML for 7.10.1
  • c9e9625 docs: prep for 7.10.1
  • e8193ff chore: make upgrade
  • 9aad22a test: improve the if TYPE_CHECKING: exclusion test
  • 1e2f41a fix: excluding TYPE_CHECKING should have been the line not the branch
  • 2134e57 fix: use getsitepackages for writing .pth files. #2006
  • a4300a7 test: signal statuses are mysterious. #2008
  • 2fd4961 docs: update the man page, for once
  • a13607f build: comment_on_fixes should show html urls
  • 0f00d49 build: bump version to 7.10.1
  • See full diff in compare view

Dependabot compatibility score

Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting @dependabot rebase.


Dependabot commands and options

You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:

  • @dependabot rebase will rebase this PR
  • @dependabot recreate will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it
  • @dependabot merge will merge this PR after your CI passes on it
  • @dependabot squash and merge will squash and merge this PR after your CI passes on it
  • @dependabot cancel merge will cancel a previously requested merge and block automerging
  • @dependabot reopen will reopen this PR if it is closed
  • @dependabot close will close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually
  • @dependabot show <dependency name> ignore conditions will show all of the ignore conditions of the specified dependency
  • @dependabot ignore this major version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore this minor version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore this dependency will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)

@dependabot @github
Copy link
Contributor Author

dependabot bot commented on behalf of github Jul 28, 2025

Reviewers

The following users could not be added as reviewers: danielnoord. Either the username does not exist or it does not have the correct permissions to be added as a reviewer.

Please fix the above issues or remove invalid values from dependabot.yml.

@dependabot @github
Copy link
Contributor Author

dependabot bot commented on behalf of github Jul 28, 2025

The reviewers field in the dependabot.yml file will be removed soon. Please use the code owners file to specify reviewers for Dependabot PRs. For more information, see this blog post.

@dependabot dependabot bot requested a review from DanielNoord July 28, 2025 04:14
@dependabot dependabot bot added the dependency Packages or modules we dependent on label Jul 28, 2025
@github-actions

This comment has been minimized.

@Pierre-Sassoulas
Copy link
Collaborator

@dependabot recreate

Bumps [coverage[toml]](https://github.com/nedbat/coveragepy) from 7.10.0 to 7.10.1.
- [Release notes](https://github.com/nedbat/coveragepy/releases)
- [Changelog](https://github.com/nedbat/coveragepy/blob/master/CHANGES.rst)
- [Commits](coveragepy/coveragepy@7.10.0...7.10.1)

---
updated-dependencies:
- dependency-name: coverage[toml]
  dependency-version: 7.10.1
  dependency-type: direct:production
  update-type: version-update:semver-patch
...

Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <[email protected]>
@dependabot dependabot bot force-pushed the dependabot/pip/coverage-toml--7.10.1 branch from da6b4ee to 09b6494 Compare August 2, 2025 11:25
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Aug 2, 2025

According to the primer, this change has no effect on the checked open source code. 🤖🎉

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 2, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (6b8d54c) to head (09b6494).
⚠️ Report is 20 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##              main      #500   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files           31        31           
  Lines         1133      1133           
  Branches       120       120           
=========================================
  Hits          1133      1133           
Flag Coverage Δ
linux 98.94% <ø> (ø)
windows 100.00% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@Pierre-Sassoulas Pierre-Sassoulas merged commit 32e3bd0 into main Aug 2, 2025
18 checks passed
@Pierre-Sassoulas Pierre-Sassoulas deleted the dependabot/pip/coverage-toml--7.10.1 branch August 2, 2025 11:29
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

dependency Packages or modules we dependent on

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants